IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Presley Norby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 5 3 8 0.333 0.0535 0.0535 — —
2013-14 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 14 16 30 1.200 0.1927 0.1927 — —
2014-15 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 21 15 36 1.895 0.3043 0.3043 — —
2015-16 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 30 18 48 2.087 0.3352 0.3352 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin D1 — — 36 10 11 21 0.583
2018-19 Wisconsin D1 — — 41 12 11 23 0.561
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W SO 36 10 19 29 0.806
2016-17 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W FR 40 6 15 21 0.525
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2016-17 · Wisconsin
+89.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2143
Forward overall
#72
Forward born in 1998
#186
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sylvia Marolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Catherine Skaja
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sylvia Marolt
Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.