← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brooke Avery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-01 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Metropolitan Riveters · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 2 1 3 4 2.000 0.9202 0.9202
2012-13 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 26 31 21 52 2.000 0.9202 0.9202
2013-14 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 27 20 31 51 1.890 0.8696 0.8696
2019-20 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 21 5 0 5 0.238
2020-21 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 3 0 1 1 0.333
2021-22 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 20 1 2 3 0.150
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Syracuse D1 38 10 12 22 0.579
2017-18 Syracuse D1 CHA-W SR 36 14 8 22 0.611
2016-17 Syracuse D1 CHA-W JR 33 4 2 6 0.182
2015-16 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W FR 32 1 1 2 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.89
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2014-15 · New Hampshire
-93.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#97
Forward overall
#6
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Rensselaer (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.96 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rensselaer ·
0.531 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
RPI ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.