IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sena Hanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 24 5 5 10 0.417 0.0669 0.0669 — —
2012-13 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 25 23 11 34 1.360 0.2184 0.2184 — —
2013-14 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 25 9 17 26 1.040 0.1670 0.1670 — —
2014-15 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 25 24 27 51 2.040 0.3276 0.3276 — —
2015-16 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 25 22 26 48 1.920 0.3084 0.3084 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 17 1 1 2 0.118
2019-20 Brown D1 ECAC-W SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Brown D1 ECAC-W JR 29 13 8 21 0.724
2017-18 Brown D1 ECAC-W SO 29 8 7 15 0.517
2016-17 Brown D1 ECAC-W FR 27 5 12 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2016-17 · Brown
+132.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2303
Forward overall
#80
Forward born in 1998
#222
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.