IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Williamson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Edina High USHS-MN-W 20 16 17 33 1.650 0.2650 0.2650 — —
2012-13 Edina High USHS-MN-W 25 24 17 41 1.640 0.2634 0.2634 — —
2013-14 Edina High USHS-MN-W 21 28 17 45 2.143 0.3441 0.3441 — —
2014-15 Edina High USHS-MN-W 21 30 20 50 2.381 0.3824 0.3824 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 39 9 12 21 0.538
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W JR 15 3 3 6 0.400
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 39 6 2 8 0.205
2015-16 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 38 5 10 15 0.395
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2015-16 · Minnesota
+25.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1573
Forward overall
#66
Forward born in 1996
#90
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Hespenheide
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Corbin Boyd
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Darby Dodds
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.