← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacqueline Kaasa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 19 2 1 3 0.158 0.0254 0.0254
2012-13 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 5 11 16 0.640 0.1028 0.1028
2013-14 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 24 17 18 35 1.458 0.2342 0.2342
2014-15 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 15 18 33 1.320 0.2120 0.2120
2015-16 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 29 11 40 1.600 0.2570 0.2570
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SR 32 5 3 8 0.250
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W JR 36 10 9 19 0.528
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SO 36 10 9 19 0.528
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W FR 38 8 9 17 0.447
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W 35 2 3 5 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2015-16 · Bemidji State
-24.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3082
Forward overall
#120
Forward born in 1998
#384
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Penn State ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.