IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paige Voight Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-04 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Metropolitan Riveters · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 North Wright County USHS-MN-W 25 16 10 26 1.040 0.1670 0.1670 — —
2013-14 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 29 15 44 1.760 0.2827 0.2827 — —
2014-15 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 20 32 15 47 2.350 0.3774 0.3774 — —
2020-21 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Merrimack D1 — — 36 11 7 18 0.500
2017-18 Merrimack D1 — — 34 5 8 13 0.382
2016-17 Merrimack D1 — — 36 15 11 26 0.722
2015-16 Merrimack D1 — — 34 11 8 19 0.559
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2015-16 · Merrimack
+92.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2078
Forward overall
#84
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brittany Wheeler
Yale ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.