IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rebekah Kolstad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 19 25 44 1.833 0.2944 0.2944 — —
2011-12 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 22 17 39 1.773 0.2847 0.2847 — —
2012-13 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 27 21 48 2.087 0.3352 0.3352 — —
2013-14 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 34 24 58 2.320 0.3726 0.3726 — —
2014-15 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 37 13 50 2.000 0.3212 0.3212 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 35 10 7 17 0.486
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 31 3 4 7 0.226
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W JR 31 3 4 7 0.226
2016-17 North Dakota D1 — — 38 6 5 11 0.289
2015-16 North Dakota D1 — — 35 0 2 2 0.057
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2015-16 · North Dakota
-80.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1601
Forward overall
#69
Forward born in 1996
#96
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sylvia Marolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.