IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katie McMillan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 2 6 0.240 0.0385 0.0385 — —
2013-14 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 6 8 0.320 0.0514 0.0514 — —
2014-15 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 14 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092 — —
2015-16 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 13 27 40 1.600 0.2570 0.2570 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SR 36 6 7 13 0.361
2018-19 Penn State D1 WCHA-W JR 36 8 9 17 0.472
2017-18 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SO 36 2 6 8 0.222
2016-17 Penn State D1 WCHA-W FR 35 4 7 11 0.314
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2016-17 · Penn State
+85.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5034
Forward overall
#190
Forward born in 1998
#979
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Brooke Madsen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kiki Radke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sophia Kunin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Melissa Haganey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Madsen
Penn State ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kiki Radke
Bemidji State ·
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.