IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gillis Frechette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 NAHA Red 16U 16U-AAA-W 69 15 13 28 0.406 0.1635 0.1635 — —
2014-15 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 27 14 16 30 1.110 0.5107 0.5107 — —
2015-16 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 26 31 11 42 1.620 0.7454 0.7454 — —
2016-17 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 27 30 18 48 1.780 0.8190 0.8190 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Cornell D1 ECAC-W GR 32 18 30 48 1.500
2021-22 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SR 29 12 28 40 1.379
2020-21 Cornell D1 ECAC-W JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SO 33 17 13 30 0.909
2018-19 Cornell D1 ECAC-W FR 36 7 6 13 0.361
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.79
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2018-19 · Cornell
-54.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#201
Forward overall
#12
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aly Tremblay
RPI ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
Mercyhurst ·
0.156 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.