IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emily Antony Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 25 11 10 21 0.840 0.1349 0.1349 — —
2011-12 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 25 29 16 45 1.800 0.2891 0.2891 — —
2012-13 Rogers High USHS-MN-W 25 13 10 23 0.920 0.1478 0.1478 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 37 7 15 22 0.595
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 30 2 11 13 0.433
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 10 2 3 5 0.500
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W JR 10 2 3 5 0.500
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 32 7 7 14 0.438
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W SO 32 7 7 14 0.438
2015-16 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 36 6 10 16 0.444
2015-16 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W FR 36 6 10 16 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2015-16 · Minnesota
+154.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4201
Forward overall
#706
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kylie Hanley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carly Bullock
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holly Dietzler
Lindenwood ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.