IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Haley Mack Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-29 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Minnesota Whitecaps · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 East Grand Forks High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 28 7 35 1.400 0.2248 0.2248 — —
2012-13 East Grand Forks High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 35 19 54 2.160 0.3469 0.3469 — —
2013-14 East Grand Forks High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 38 34 72 2.880 0.4625 0.4625 — —
2020-21 Minnesota Whitecaps PHF 4 2 1 3 0.750 — — — —
2021-22 Minnesota Whitecaps PHF 17 4 5 9 0.529 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SR 37 15 13 28 0.757
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W JR 22 8 3 11 0.500
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SO 22 8 3 11 0.500
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W FR 38 11 14 25 0.658
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 35 4 9 13 0.371
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · Bemidji State
+4.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1350
Forward overall
#46
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.