← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kiki Radke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Hastings High USHS-MN-W 21 5 6 11 0.524 0.0841 0.0841
2012-13 Hastings High USHS-MN-W 24 16 22 38 1.583 0.2543 0.2543
2013-14 Hastings High USHS-MN-W 25 20 11 31 1.240 0.1991 0.1991
2014-15 Hastings High USHS-MN-W 25 30 20 50 2.000 0.3212 0.3212
2015-16 Hastings High USHS-MN-W 25 39 17 56 2.240 0.3597 0.3597
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SR 35 6 13 19 0.543
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W JR 33 3 8 11 0.333
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SO 33 3 8 11 0.333
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W FR 35 3 9 12 0.343
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W 33 3 6 9 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2015-16 · Bemidji State
+17.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1937
Forward overall
#64
Forward born in 1998
#147
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Yale ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.