| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Camb-Isanti/Mora/PC (W) | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0.609 | 0.0978 | 0.0978 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Warroad High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.769 | 0.1235 | 0.1235 | — | — |
| 2014-15 | Warroad High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 24 | 14 | 25 | 39 | 1.625 | 0.2610 | 0.2610 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Warroad High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 30 | 34 | 64 | 2.560 | 0.4111 | 0.4111 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Warroad High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 29 | 40 | 69 | 2.760 | 0.4433 | 0.4433 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Warroad High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 38 | 26 | 64 | 2.560 | 0.4111 | 0.4111 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Merrimack | D1 | HEA-W | — | 36 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.333 |
| 2021-22 | Merrimack | D1 | HEA-W | — | 31 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.290 |
| 2020-21 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | — | 20 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.250 |
| 2019-20 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | — | 35 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.200 |
| 2018-19 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | — | 35 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.257 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.