IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Annelise Rice Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 0 1 1 0.048 0.0076 0.0076 — —
2013-14 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 11 9 20 0.800 0.1285 0.1285 — —
2014-15 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 21 8 29 1.160 0.1863 0.1863 — —
2015-16 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 10 13 23 0.958 0.1539 0.1539 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Providence D1 HEA-W — 17 5 2 7 0.412
2019-20 Providence D1 HEA-W — 36 2 8 10 0.278
2018-19 Providence D1 HEA-W — 34 0 9 9 0.265
2016-17 North Dakota D1 — — 25 1 1 2 0.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2016-17 · North Dakota
-44.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5213
Forward overall
#184
Forward born in 1997
#1055
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Emily Antony
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carly Bullock
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Antony
Minnesota ·
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.