← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corinne McCool Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-08-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep-Girls 26 2 8 10 0.380 0.1748 0.1748
2015-16 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep-Girls 28 11 9 20 0.710 0.3267 0.3267
2016-17 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep-Girls 29 40 26 66 2.280 1.0490 1.0490
2017-18 Lawrence Academy NE-Prep-Girls 29 27 10 37 1.280 0.5889 0.5889
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Vermont D1 HEA-W GR 36 13 20 33 0.917
2021-22 Vermont D1 SR 34 5 10 15 0.441
2020-21 Vermont D1 JR 11 5 3 8 0.727
2019-20 Vermont D1 SO 35 13 11 24 0.686
2018-19 Vermont D1 FR 28 3 4 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.77
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2018-19 · Vermont
-67.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 22 comparables)

27%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
73%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#261
Forward overall
#17
Forward born in 1999
#29
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.