IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sofia Poinar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 9 10 19 0.760 0.1221 0.1221 — —
2013-14 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 9 19 28 1.120 0.1799 0.1799 — —
2014-15 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 21 23 44 1.760 0.2827 0.2827 — —
2015-16 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 23 15 23 38 1.652 0.2653 0.2653 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 33 2 6 8 0.242
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 35 2 4 6 0.171
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 32 2 2 4 0.125
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W SO 32 2 2 4 0.125
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 36 1 0 1 0.028
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W FR 36 1 0 1 0.028
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2016-17 · Minnesota
-88.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2809
Forward overall
#102
Forward born in 1998
#315
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Taylor Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christi Vetter
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.67 PPG
→ Penn State
0.27 No data
NCAAe PPG
Melissa Haganey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Radovich
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Williamson
Minnesota ·
0.395 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Gunderson
Lindenwood ·
0.171 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Christi Vetter
Penn State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.