← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joie Phelps Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 2 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483
2012-13 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 24 7 8 15 0.625 0.0944 0.0944
2013-14 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 23 15 14 29 1.261 0.1904 0.1904
2014-15 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 25 37 18 55 2.200 0.3322 0.3322
2015-16 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 25 24 29 53 2.120 0.3201 0.3201
2016-17 St. Paul United (W) USHS-MN-W 25 23 29 52 2.080 0.3141 0.3141
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Cornell D1 ECAC-W JR 28 2 2 4 0.143
2018-19 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SO 36 1 3 4 0.111
2017-18 Cornell D1 ECAC-W FR 33 6 0 6 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2017-18 · Cornell
-32.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1608
Forward overall
#98
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.844 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.