IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bridget Carey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2301 0.2301 — —
2012-13 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 26 21 15 36 1.380 0.6349 0.6349 — —
2013-14 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 27 17 18 35 1.300 0.5981 0.5981 — —
2014-15 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 25 19 10 29 1.160 0.5337 0.5337 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Brown D1 ECAC-W SR 8 3 0 3 0.375
2017-18 Brown D1 ECAC-W JR 24 4 3 7 0.292
2016-17 Brown D1 ECAC-W SO 29 6 7 13 0.448
2015-16 Brown D1 ECAC-W FR 28 5 5 10 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.52
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2015-16 · Brown
-31.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#420
Forward overall
#30
Forward born in 1996
#41
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saana Valkama
Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Annie Roche
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.