IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mariah Gardner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 12 23 35 1.400 0.2248 0.2248 — —
2013-14 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 23 24 47 1.741 0.2796 0.2796 — —
2014-15 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 18 36 54 2.160 0.3469 0.3469 — —
2015-16 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 34 48 82 3.280 0.5268 0.5268 — —
2016-17 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 34 32 66 2.870 0.4609 0.4609 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 16 0 2 2 0.125
2019-20 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 37 6 10 16 0.432
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 29 2 1 3 0.103
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 14 0 1 1 0.071
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W FR 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2017-18 · Minnesota
-82.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#854
Forward overall
#51
Forward born in 1999
#18
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Haley Mack
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.