IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kippin Keller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-12-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 23 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 10 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092 — —
2013-14 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 3 13 0.520 0.0835 0.0835 — —
2014-15 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 19 26 1.040 0.1670 0.1670 — —
2015-16 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 33 40 1.600 0.2570 0.2570 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 36 3 2 5 0.139
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 17 1 2 3 0.176
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 29 2 8 10 0.345
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 36 1 1 2 0.056
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2016-17 · Minnesota
-70.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4228
Forward overall
#158
Forward born in 1997
#718
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Brooke Madsen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kiki Radke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sophia Kunin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Melissa Haganey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Madsen
Penn State ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kiki Radke
Bemidji State ·
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.