IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucy Burton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 3 6 0.240 0.0385 0.0385 — —
2013-14 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 8 12 0.480 0.0771 0.0771 — —
2014-15 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 6 12 0.480 0.0771 0.0771 — —
2015-16 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 11 13 24 0.960 0.1542 0.1542 — —
2016-17 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 21 20 41 1.640 0.2634 0.2634 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Yale D1 ECAC-W JR 28 1 0 1 0.036
2018-19 Yale D1 ECAC-W SO 23 1 2 3 0.130
2017-18 Yale D1 ECAC-W FR 25 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#4309
Forward overall
#160
Forward born in 1998
#740
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Taylor Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Melissa Haganey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Radovich
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sophia Kunin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Williamson
Minnesota ·
0.395 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Gunderson
Lindenwood ·
0.171 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Melissa Haganey
Northeastern ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.