IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sylvia Marolt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Thief River Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 8 15 23 1.000 0.1606 0.1606 — —
2011-12 Thief River Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 16 23 0.920 0.1478 0.1478 — —
2012-13 Thief River Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 33 20 53 2.120 0.3405 0.3405 — —
2013-14 Thief River Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 14 17 31 1.348 0.2165 0.2165 — —
2014-15 Thief River Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 15 24 39 1.696 0.2723 0.2723 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SR 19 0 3 3 0.158
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W JR 19 0 3 3 0.158
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W SO 18 2 1 3 0.167
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W FR 29 0 1 1 0.034
2014-15 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#2490
Forward overall
#103
Forward born in 1997
#257
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christi Vetter
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.67 PPG
→ Penn State
0.27 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Gunderson
Lindenwood ·
0.171 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Charly Dalhquist
North Dakota ·
0.241 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
Minnesota ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.