IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kendall Williamson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 4 7 0.280 0.0450 0.0450 — —
2012-13 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 9 19 0.760 0.1221 0.1221 — —
2013-14 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 14 8 22 0.880 0.1413 0.1413 — —
2014-15 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 9 5 14 0.560 0.0899 0.0899 — —
2015-16 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 12 15 27 1.080 0.1734 0.1734 — —
2016-17 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 24 12 15 27 1.125 0.1807 0.1807 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC-W SR 23 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC-W JR 38 1 2 3 0.079
2018-19 Colgate D1 ECAC-W SO 36 2 0 2 0.056
2017-18 Colgate D1 ECAC-W FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#5233
Forward overall
#198
Forward born in 1998
#1063
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Zumwinkle
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.