IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christi Vetter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 22 19 41 1.640 0.2634 0.2634 — —
2011-12 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 18 20 38 1.520 0.2441 0.2441 — —
2012-13 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 24 18 22 40 1.667 0.2677 0.2677 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Penn State D1 WCHA-W GR 28 0 2 2 0.071
2017-18 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SR 35 6 2 8 0.229
2016-17 Penn State D1 WCHA-W JR 27 1 1 2 0.074
2015-16 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SO 13 1 0 1 0.077
2014-15 Penn State D1 CHA-W FR 13 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#2667
Forward overall
#82
Forward born in 1995
#285
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Melissa Haganey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Charly Dalhquist
North Dakota ·
0.241 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
Minnesota ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Williamson
Minnesota ·
0.395 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.