IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stella Haberman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 0 3 3 0.125 0.0201 0.0201 — —
2013-14 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 6 1 7 0.292 0.0468 0.0468 — —
2014-15 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 8 3 11 0.458 0.0736 0.0736 — —
2015-16 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 15 10 25 1.000 0.1606 0.1606 — —
2016-17 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 17 15 32 1.280 0.2056 0.2056 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 RIT D1 CHA-W — 9 0 1 1 0.111
2019-20 RIT D1 CHA-W — 26 1 5 6 0.231
2018-19 RIT D1 CHA-W — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2017-18 RIT D1 CHA-W FR 32 1 3 4 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2017-18 · RIT
-22.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5111
Forward overall
#189
Forward born in 1999
#1012
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sena Hanson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Savannah Quandt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sena Hanson
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Savannah Quandt
Minnesota ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.