← New Search ↗ Social Card

Demi Gardner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 13 27 40 1.600 0.2570 0.2570
2012-13 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 23 30 53 2.120 0.3405 0.3405
2013-14 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 14 20 34 1.546 0.2482 0.2482
2014-15 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 13 13 8 21 1.615 0.2594 0.2594
2015-16 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 13 12 22 34 2.615 0.4200 0.4200
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 16 0 1 1 0.062
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 17 3 1 4 0.235
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W SO 17 3 1 4 0.235
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 24 4 2 6 0.250
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W FR 24 4 2 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2016-17 · Minnesota
-17.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1723
Forward overall
#78
Forward born in 1997
#112
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.