IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brooklynn Schugel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 New Ulm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 25 15 40 1.600 0.2570 0.2570 — —
2012-13 New Ulm High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 22 15 37 1.542 0.2476 0.2476 — —
2013-14 New Ulm High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 26 26 52 2.261 0.3631 0.3631 — —
2014-15 New Ulm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 45 35 80 3.200 0.5139 0.5139 — —
2015-16 New Ulm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 44 24 68 2.720 0.4368 0.4368 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W — 36 0 2 2 0.056
2018-19 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W — 29 0 1 1 0.035
2016-17 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W FR 37 5 5 10 0.270
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2016-17 · Minnesota Duluth
-32.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#901
Forward overall
#47
Forward born in 1997
#22
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.