icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) | USHS-MN-W | 9 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.556 | 0.0892 | 0.0892 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 8 | 18 | 26 | 1.040 | 0.1670 | 0.1670 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 0.640 | 0.1028 | 0.1028 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Edina High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 14 | 19 | 33 | 1.320 | 0.2120 | 0.2120 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2017-18 | Minnesota | D1 | WCHA-W | JR | 38 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.079 |
| 2016-17 | Merrimack | D1 | — | — | 36 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.333 |
| 2015-16 | Merrimack | D1 | — | — | 34 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0.324 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.