IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dana Rasmussen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 30 17 47 1.958 0.3145 0.3145 — —
2011-12 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 38 31 69 2.760 0.4433 0.4433 — —
2012-13 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 39 24 63 2.625 0.4216 0.4216 — —
2013-14 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 48 26 74 2.960 0.4754 0.4754 — —
2014-15 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 44 38 82 3.280 0.5268 0.5268 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W GR 35 5 3 8 0.229
2018-19 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SR 25 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W JR 33 4 1 5 0.151
2015-16 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W FR 18 2 1 3 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2015-16 · Ohio State
-64.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#698
Forward overall
#39
Forward born in 1997
#11
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.78 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saana Valkama
Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.