← New Search ↗ Social Card

Renee Saltness Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 19 8 7 15 0.789 0.1268 0.1268
2013-14 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 24 14 8 22 0.917 0.1472 0.1472
2014-15 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 25 33 37 70 2.800 0.4497 0.4497
2015-16 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 25 31 24 55 2.200 0.3533 0.3533
2016-17 Rochester J.M./Lourdes USHS-MN-W 25 45 25 70 2.800 0.4497 0.4497
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W SR 37 4 5 9 0.243
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W JR 16 6 9 15 0.938
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W SO 37 4 5 9 0.243
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W FR 32 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W FR 34 0 1 1 0.029
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2017-18 · Quinnipiac
-91.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1033
Forward overall
#31
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.