← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katie Huntington Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 2 3 5 0.200 0.0321 0.0321
2013-14 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 11 6 17 0.708 0.1138 0.1138
2014-15 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 20 13 33 1.320 0.2120 0.2120
2015-16 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 22 17 39 1.625 0.2610 0.2610
2016-17 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 30 12 42 1.680 0.2698 0.2698
2017-18 Prior Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 33 15 48 2.087 0.3352 0.3352
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W SR 32 0 1 1 0.031
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W JR 16 1 1 2 0.125
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W SO 36 0 1 1 0.028
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W FR 33 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2103
Forward overall
#111
Forward born in 1999
#172
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.