IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nina Rossi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 49 11 22 33 0.673 0.1961 0.2128 — —
2022-23 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 61 24 21 45 0.738 0.2147 0.2196 — —
2023-24 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 55 35 36 71 1.291 0.3758 0.3618 — —
2024-25 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 46 24 31 55 1.196 0.3481 0.3245 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HEA-W FR 35 14 20 34 0.971
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.97
2025-26 · New Hampshire
+234.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1762
Forward overall
#36
Forward born in 2007
#603
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Catherine Skaja
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.