IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Becca Kniss Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Eden Prairie High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 7 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604 — —
2016-17 Eden Prairie High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 8 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2017-18 Eden Prairie High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 8 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604 — —
2018-19 Eden Prairie High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 4 5 9 0.375 0.0566 0.0566 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA — 32 12 9 21 0.656
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D3 — JR 32 12 9 21 0.656
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA — 2 1 2 3 1.500
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D3 — SO 2 1 2 3 1.500
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA — 32 13 20 33 1.031
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D3 — FR 32 13 20 33 1.031
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.03
2019-20 · Franklin Pierce
+1970.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10767
Forward overall
#361
Forward born in 2000
#3684
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Taylor Heise
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Smith
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Laura Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Presley Norby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Heise
Minnesota ·
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sierra Smith
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Laura Anderson
Yale ·
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.