IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Darcie Lappan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-15 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Vancouver Goldeneyes · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 MoDo Hockey SDHL 32 10 7 17 0.531 0.6135 0.6182 — —
2025-26 Vancouver Goldeneyes PWHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 40 13 19 32 0.800
2022-23 Clarkson D1 ECAC-W — 42 13 27 40 0.952
2021-22 Colgate D1 ECAC-W — 36 7 5 12 0.333
2020-21 Colgate D1 ECAC-W — 23 5 1 6 0.261
2019-20 Colgate D1 ECAC-W — 34 9 4 13 0.382

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#347
Forward overall
#18
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Phoebe Staenz
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Yale (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bridget Carey
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.38 PPG
→ Brown (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.63 Average
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Phoebe Staenz
Yale ·
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bridget Carey
Brown ·
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.