← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Teghan Inglis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-27 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.45
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4721
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.95
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG1.0014
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

38%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
62%
Club / Other

Based on 29 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2018-19 Pursuit of Excellence CSSHL-U18W 28 8 26 34 1.214 0.2782 0.2782
2024-25 HV71 SDHL 36 3 16 19 0.528 0.6173 0.6126
2025-26 HV71 SDHL 34 5 12 17 0.500 0.5847 0.5578
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2023-24 Merrimack HEA-W JR 36 3 8 11 0.306
2022-23 Merrimack HEA-W SO 31 5 10 15 0.484
2021-22 Merrimack HEA-W FR 33 13 5 18 0.545
2020-21 Ohio State WCHA-W SO 18 0 4 4 0.222
2019-20 Ohio State WCHA-W FR 38 3 7 10 0.263

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Molly Terebayza 2021-22 · 1.44 PPG 0.731 St. Olaf MIAC
Dani Sibley 2010-11 · 1.44 PPG 0.733 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Claire Cripps 2010-11 · 2.20 PPG 0.480 Augsburg MIAC
Emily Cronkhite 2018-19 · 1.76 PPG 0.600 Augsburg MIAC
Katie Aney 2012-13 · 2.75 PPG 0.385 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.