IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Teghan Inglis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-27 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
HV71 · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pursuit of Excellence CSSHL-U18W 28 8 26 34 1.214 0.2782 0.2782 — —
2024-25 HV71 SDHL 36 3 16 19 0.528 0.6096 0.6050 — —
2025-26 HV71 SDHL 34 5 12 17 0.500 0.5775 0.5510 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HEA-W — 36 3 8 11 0.306
2022-23 Merrimack D1 HEA-W — 31 5 10 15 0.484
2021-22 Merrimack D1 HEA-W — 33 13 5 18 0.545
2020-21 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W — 18 0 4 4 0.222
2019-20 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W — 38 3 7 10 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2019-20 · Ohio State
0.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 34 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#83
Defenseman overall
#27
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kendra Nealey
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Cornell (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Briana Mastel
Harvard ·
0.258 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kendra Nealey
Cornell ·
0.212 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.