IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jessie Aney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Rochester Century/JM High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 18 14 32 1.454 0.2336 0.2336 — —
2011-12 Rochester Century/JM High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 23 49 72 3.000 0.4818 0.4818 — —
2012-13 Rochester Century/JM High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 40 36 76 3.167 0.5086 0.5086 — —
2013-14 Rochester Century/JM High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 51 58 109 4.360 0.7002 0.7002 — —
2014-15 Rochester Century/JM High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 44 52 96 4.364 0.7008 0.7008 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 UConn D1 — — 30 3 5 8 0.267
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.65
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2019-20 · UConn
-59.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#277
Forward overall
#11
Forward born in 1998
#3
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Erin Conway
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Average
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erin Conway
Brown ·
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Schammel
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.