IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mallorie Iozzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 9 3 12 0.500 0.0803 0.0803 — —
2013-14 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 21 28 1.120 0.1799 0.1799 — —
2014-15 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 14 22 36 1.500 0.2409 0.2409 — —
2015-16 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 29 13 42 1.680 0.2698 0.2698 — —
2016-17 Hibbing/Chisholm High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 28 27 55 2.200 0.3533 0.3533 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 31 1 3 4 0.129
2017-18 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W FR 29 1 1 2 0.069
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2017-18 · Minnesota Duluth
-74.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2058
Forward overall
#106
Forward born in 1999
#168
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Karlie Lund
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (1.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carly Bullock
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Karlie Lund
Princeton ·
1.182 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Catherine Skaja
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.