IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jamie Nelson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-06-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Andover High USHS-MN-W 25 8 10 18 0.720 0.1156 0.1156 — —
2017-18 Andover High USHS-MN-W 25 25 35 60 2.400 0.3854 0.3854 — —
2018-19 Andover High USHS-MN-W 24 17 35 52 2.167 0.3480 0.3480 — —
2019-20 Andover High USHS-MN-W 24 22 35 57 2.375 0.3814 0.3814 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 39 11 31 42 1.077
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W GR 37 8 22 30 0.811
2023-24 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SR 38 20 10 30 0.789
2022-23 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W JR 29 5 22 27 0.931
2021-22 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SO 2 1 0 1 0.500
2020-21 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W FR 18 8 7 15 0.833
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2020-21 · Minnesota
+168.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1350
Forward overall
#62
Forward born in 2002
#60
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.16 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Karlie Lund
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Princeton (1.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Haley Mack
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Corbin Boyd
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.