| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | St. Louis Park High | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 1.040 | 0.1670 | 0.1670 | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.840 | 0.1349 | 0.1349 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Breck School (W) | USHS-MN-W | 23 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 0.739 | 0.1187 | 0.1187 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Breck School (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 25 | 10 | 35 | 1.400 | 0.2248 | 0.2248 | — | — |
| 2018-19 | Breck School (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 25 | 27 | 52 | 2.080 | 0.3340 | 0.3340 | — | — |
| 2019-20 | Breck School (W) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 43 | 30 | 73 | 2.920 | 0.4690 | 0.4690 | — | — |
| 2025-26 | Boston Fleet | PWHL | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.500 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Minnesota Duluth | D1 | WCHA-W | GR | 39 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 0.692 |
| 2023-24 | Ohio State | D1 | WCHA-W | — | 39 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 0.692 |
| 2022-23 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 40 | 15 | 28 | 43 | 1.075 |
| 2021-22 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 39 | 17 | 17 | 34 | 0.872 |
| 2020-21 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 14 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.571 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.