← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lily Delianedis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-07 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Seattle Torrent · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 24 5 11 16 0.667 0.1071 0.1071
2016-17 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 16 21 37 1.480 0.2377 0.2377
2017-18 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 14 22 36 1.440 0.2313 0.2313
2018-19 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 30 32 62 2.480 0.3983 0.3983
2019-20 Blake School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 41 27 68 2.720 0.4368 0.4368
2025-26 Seattle Torrent PWHL 24 0 2 2 0.083
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Cornell D1 ECAC-W GR 35 12 10 22 0.629
2023-24 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SR 34 16 18 34 1.000
2022-23 Cornell D1 ECAC-W JR 27 11 16 27 1.000
2021-22 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SO 29 14 13 27 0.931
2020-21 Cornell D1 ECAC-W FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1308
Forward overall
#59
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.