IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brieja Parent Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 24 4 9 13 0.542 0.0870 0.0870 — —
2016-17 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 16 8 10 18 1.125 0.1807 0.1807 — —
2017-18 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 25 18 15 33 1.320 0.2120 0.2120 — —
2018-19 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 25 14 13 27 1.080 0.1734 0.1734 — —
2019-20 Forest Lake High (MN women) USHS-MN-W 25 31 30 61 2.440 0.3919 0.3919 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W — 36 4 4 8 0.222
2023-24 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W SR 37 3 8 11 0.297
2022-23 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W JR 36 4 4 8 0.222
2021-22 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W — 15 3 2 5 0.333
2020-21 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W — 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2310
Forward overall
#93
Forward born in 2001
#225
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Chancellor
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.