← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyra Turner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Andover High USHS-MN-W 25 10 6 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966
2018-19 Andover High USHS-MN-W 24 8 7 15 0.625 0.0944 0.0944
2019-20 Andover High USHS-MN-W 23 8 18 26 1.130 0.1707 0.1707
2020-21 Andover High USHS-MN-W 23 12 21 33 1.435 0.2167 0.2167
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA SR 37 12 14 26 0.703
2023-24 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA JR 33 6 15 21 0.636
2022-23 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA SO 38 19 19 38 1.000
2021-22 Saint Anselm D1 NEWHA FR 31 14 14 28 0.903
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.90
2021-22 · Saint Anselm
+1006.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4372
Forward overall
#176
Forward born in 2003
#754
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cornell ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.