← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Sarah Marchand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-26 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.66
Strong (0.45–0.70)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.7043
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.87
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
1.28
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG1.4952
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

8%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
92%
Club / Other

Based on 38 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2025-26 MoDo Hockey SDHL 36 9 16 25 0.694 0.8121 0.8525
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2024-25 St. Lawrence ECAC-W SO 39 9 16 25 0.641
2023-24 St. Lawrence ECAC-W FR 39 12 22 34 0.872
2022-23 Syracuse CHA-W SO 36 8 8 16 0.444
2021-22 Syracuse CHA-W FR 32 10 15 25 0.781

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Caitrin Lonergan NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG 0.892 Boston College

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Maddie Evangelous 2014-15 · 1.80 PPG 0.885 Elmira UCHC
Emma Crocker 2015-16 · 2.06 PPG 0.769 Elmira UCHC
Dani Sibley 2012-13 · 2.24 PPG 0.733 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Mikaila Rubin 2015-16 · 2.42 PPG 0.654 Nazareth UCHC
Molly Garin 2015-16 · 1.24 PPG 1.267 Hamline MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.