icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Stanstead College Varsity (W) | CAHS-W | 53 | 35 | 32 | 67 | 1.264 | 0.4536 | 0.4536 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Stanstead College Varsity (W) | CAHS-W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 41 | 6 | 23 | 29 | 0.707 |
| 2024-25 | Quinnipiac | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 38 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 0.474 |
| 2023-24 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 40 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.175 |
| 2022-23 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2021-22 | Clarkson | D1 | ECAC-W | — | 37 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0.324 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.