IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kiersten Browning Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Rosemount High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 5 2 7 0.292 0.0440 0.0440 — —
2017-18 Rosemount High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 5 6 11 0.478 0.0722 0.0722 — —
2018-19 Rosemount High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 7 9 16 0.667 0.1007 0.1007 — —
2019-20 Rosemount High (women) USHS-MN-W 21 3 6 9 0.429 0.0647 0.0647 — —
2020-21 Rosemount High (women) USHS-MN-W 17 9 16 25 1.471 0.2221 0.2221 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Assumption D1 NEWHA SR 28 7 1 8 0.286
2023-24 Assumption D1 NEWHA JR 28 3 1 4 0.143
2022-23 Post D1 CHA-W SO 33 8 12 20 0.606
2022-23 Post D3 — SO 15 2 4 6 0.400
2021-22 Post D1 CHA-W — 30 6 5 11 0.367
2021-22 Post D3 — FR 28 5 4 9 0.321
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2021-22 · Post
+380.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5457
Forward overall
#1114
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kourtney Menches
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kippin Keller
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kourtney Menches
Vermont ·
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kippin Keller
Minnesota ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Johnson
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.