IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Angelina Ruiz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 21 1 1 2 0.095 0.0144 0.0144 — —
2018-19 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Gentry Academy (women) USHS-MN-W 22 15 13 28 1.273 0.1922 0.1922 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SR 36 3 2 5 0.139
2024-25 St. Michael's College D3 — SR 32 2 1 3 0.094
2023-24 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA JR 25 4 4 8 0.320
2023-24 St. Michael's College D3 — JR 18 2 3 5 0.278
2022-23 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SO 32 8 2 10 0.312
2022-23 St. Michael's College D3 — SO 27 6 2 8 0.296
2021-22 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA FR 26 6 3 9 0.346
2021-22 St. Michael's College D3 — FR 23 6 2 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2021-22 · St. Michael's College
+2714.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6610
Forward overall
#281
Forward born in 2003
#1570
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Amber Moore
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.05 PPG
→ Cornell (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Anna Johnson
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stella Haberman
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Annelise Rice
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Olivia Arkell
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amber Moore
Cornell ·
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Johnson
Mercyhurst ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Stella Haberman
RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.