← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sarah Paul Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Okanagan HA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 23 25 14 39 1.696 0.3885 0.3885
2019-20 Pursuit of Excellence CSSHL-U18W 10 12 2 14 1.400 0.3207 0.3207
2020-21 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 2 3 0 3 1.500 0.3437 0.3437
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W SR 8 3 5 8 1.000
2024-25 Princeton D1 ECAC-W 31 28 8 36 1.161
2023-24 Princeton D1 ECAC-W 32 16 7 23 0.719
2021-22 Princeton D1 ECAC-W 7 2 3 5 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2021-22 · Princeton
+114.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 1 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1529
Forward overall
#53
Forward born in 2003
#12
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.