Madison Michals Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-22 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2017-18	Noble & Greenough	NE-Prep-Girls	31	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2018-19	Noble & Greenough	NE-Prep-Girls	32	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2025-26	Merrimack	D1	HEA-W	—	19	1	2	3	0.158
2024-25	College of the Holy Cross	D1	NEWHA	—	32	2	5	7	0.219
2024-25	Holy Cross	D1	NEWHA	SR	32	2	5	7	0.219
2023-24	College of the Holy Cross	D1	NEWHA	—	29	4	2	6	0.207
2023-24	Holy Cross	D1	NEWHA	JR	28	4	2	6	0.214
2022-23	College of the Holy Cross	D1	NEWHA	—	34	1	1	2	0.059
2022-23	Holy Cross	D1	NEWHA	SO	34	1	1	2	0.059
2021-22	Boston University	D1	—	—	3	0	0	0	0.000

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.