IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mia Vergilii Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 47 0 8 8 0.170 0.0495 0.0543 — —
2023-24 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 57 19 33 52 0.912 0.2656 0.2586 — —
2024-25 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 46 8 12 20 0.435 0.1266 0.1194 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston University D1 HEA-W FR 27 1 0 1 0.037
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2025-26 · Boston University
-75.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5410
Forward overall
#236
Forward born in 2007
#1892
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sofia Poinar
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sierra Semmel
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
St. Cloud State ·
0.151 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Janna Haeg
St. Cloud State ·
0.303 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.