IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hilda Svensson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-24 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
HV71 · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HV71 SDHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.3850 0.3850 — —
2021-22 HV71 SDHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.2310 0.2310 — —
2022-23 HV71 SDHL 32 9 13 22 0.688 0.7941 0.7941 — —
2023-24 HV71 SDHL 32 7 16 23 0.719 0.8302 0.8302 — —
2024-25 HV71 SDHL 36 7 19 26 0.722 0.8341 0.8341 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W — 33 18 34 52 1.576
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.83
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.58
2025-26 · Ohio State
+90.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#134
Forward overall
#5
Forward born in 2006
#62
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Aly Tremblay
RPI ·
0.030 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.